
HEY PROGRESSIVE, YOU SHOULDN’T LIE ABOUT THINGS THAT ARE PUBLIC INFORMATION IN COURT RECORDS.
Yeah, feel free to quibble over the definition of “defended by” and “interested party.” Fortunately you are now in the court of public opinion.
(just to make it clear, I’m not smart enough to look for this myself. a commenter posted it on Progressive’s Facebook wall)
-
drcoolsex likes this
-
thisawkwardpause likes this
-
britajames reblogged this from purns and added:
@progressive is still fucking awful. You still haven’t switched?
-
britajames likes this
-
mimi-or-u-u reblogged this from patbaer and added:
Progressive = pathetic - this lie was never gonna get any traction with all the documentation available as public...
-
peterdamato reblogged this from jonbershad
-
magical-happiness reblogged this from evanfleischer
-
bridgecomedy likes this
-
sanctimonypony likes this
-
sarcasmsandorgasms likes this
-
patbaer reblogged this from purns
-
weaziller77 likes this
-
ericscott likes this
-
kellydeal likes this
-
mattfisher likes this
-
blogalicious reblogged this from khealywu
-
purns reblogged this from khealywu
-
evanfleischer reblogged this from khealywu and added:
The information is in the Gawker post I attached to the bottom of Matt’s update. Re-blogging for emphasis. And for what...
-
deantrippe likes this
-
abbijacobson likes this
-
whineandbeer likes this
-
kelsium likes this
-
khealywu reblogged this from uncannybrettwhite and added:
Spread it loud and wide.
-
austinnewyork likes this
-
khealywu likes this
-
jhermann likes this
-
uncannybrettwhite reblogged this from jonbershad
-
halphillips likes this
-
jonbershad posted this
Permalink